NV · state guide

Nevada background screening law

How the courts here are organized

Nevada does not organize its trial courts by county, and the unit that separates one set of files from another is the judicial district. NRS 3.010 states it directly: "The State is hereby divided into 11 judicial districts, as follows." The section then names them one by one, and three of the eleven take in more than one county. "The Counties of Esmeralda and Nye constitute the Fifth Judicial District." "The Counties of Eureka, White Pine and Lincoln constitute the Seventh Judicial District." "The Counties of Lander, Mineral and Pershing constitute the Eleventh Judicial District." The First is a pairing of a different kind, holding Carson City, an independent city, together with Storey County. A search that models Nevada as seventeen county courts is wrong in four places before it reaches the bench.

The tiers come from the Constitution and from chapter 4. Article 6, section 1 provides that "[t]he judicial power of this State is vested in a court system, comprising a Supreme Court, a court of appeals, district courts and justices of the peace", and adds that "[t]he Legislature may also establish, as part of the system, courts for municipal purposes only in incorporated cities and towns." Article 6, section 6, subsection 1 then gives the felony tier its jurisdiction by exclusion rather than by naming felonies: "The District Courts in the several Judicial Districts of this State have original jurisdiction in all cases excluded by law from the original jurisdiction of justices' courts. They also have final appellate jurisdiction in cases arising in Justices Courts and such other inferior tribunals as may be established by law." The district court is the felony court because the justice court is not, and the statute says so.

The justice court is confined by its own section. NRS 4.370(3) provides: "Justice courts have jurisdiction of all misdemeanors and no other criminal offenses except as otherwise provided by specific statute." Its civil jurisdiction runs to $15,000. Municipal courts, which the Constitution permits for "courts for municipal purposes only in incorporated cities and towns", take jurisdiction under NRS 5.050 over civil actions "[f]or the violation of any ordinance of their respective cities" and over "all misdemeanors committed in violation of the ordinances of their respective cities". Above the district courts sits the Court of Appeals at chapter 2A, whose jurisdiction the Supreme Court fixes by rule rather than the Legislature by statute: NRS 2A.160 provides that "[t]he Supreme Court shall fix by rule the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals and shall provide for the review, where appropriate, of appeals decided by the Court of Appeals." A misdemeanor, a gross misdemeanor and a felony can therefore each begin in a different court in the same county, and only the felony ends in the district court.

The bench is set district by district rather than by a formula, and the two large districts carry most of it. The Eighth Judicial District, which is Clark County, has 32 district judges who are not family court judges under NRS 3.018 and 26 who are family court judges under NRS 3.0185. The Second, which is Washoe County, has nine and seven under NRS 3.012 and NRS 3.0125. The remaining districts are small, several with a single judge. NRS 3.0105 establishes a family court as a division of the district court "in each judicial district that includes a county whose population is 100,000 or more", and NRS 3.025 requires the district judges in such a district to choose a Chief Judge, with NRS 3.004 defining a "Department of the family court" as "any department of the district court that is designated as a department of the family court". A filing is therefore identified by district, department and case number rather than by county and court alone.

What a search actually meets is a set of separate courts, and the largest one states its own terms. The Eighth Judicial District Court publishes its records policy: "The Clerk of the Court maintains court records from September 1909 through the present date. Most records dating from 1990 to present may be searched online." It requires an identifier: "A case number is required to access court records. If you do not have a case number, please provide the complete names of the parties in the case, along with the year the action was filed." Its fees are set by statute: "The cost for a search of records prior to 1990 is $0.50 per year, per name (NRS 19.013). The cost for photocopies is $0.50 per page (NRS 19.013)." Certification adds $3.00 per document and exemplification $6.00, and "[s]ealed Civil and Criminal cases require a court order to obtain documents or information". The same page carries the boundary condition that "[r]ecords prior to 1909 must be obtained from Lincoln County".

The repository and the courts hold different things, and the difference is stated by the agency that runs the repository. Its own description of a Nevada criminal history record excludes "[c]ourt indices and records of public judicial proceedings, court decisions and opinions, and information disclosed during public judicial proceedings", "[r]ecords of traffic violations constituting misdemeanors", "[i]nformation concerning juveniles", "[r]ecords of application for and issuance, suspension, revocation or renewal of occupational licenses, including permits to work in the gaming industry", and "[r]ecords which originated in an agency other than an agency of criminal justice in this state". The same page adds that a record is "based upon the person's fingerprints obtained at the time of the person's arrest and corresponding dispositions of arrests, as of 1987", and that "[i]n order to obtain a criminal history record prior to 1987, a request would have to be made of the arresting agency". A Nevada repository response cannot see a court index entry, a misdemeanor traffic conviction, a juvenile matter, a licensing action or anything from outside Nevada, and its historical reach begins at the fingerprint record rather than at the state's beginning.

There are two statutory doors into the state record and they return different content. NRS 179A.100(1)(a) allows an agency of criminal justice to disseminate without restriction records "which reflect records of conviction only", and 179A.100(3) requires dissemination to a prospective employer, on request, of records from a name-based inquiry which either "[r]eflect convictions only" or "[p]ertain to an incident for which the prospective employee or volunteer is currently within the system of criminal justice, including parole or probation". The 179A.103 service described above is the commercial door and it returns convictions. A request to the maintaining agency, made under 179A.100(4)(m) with the subject's "written consent to the release of that information by the agency which maintains it", is the other door and it can also return a matter that is still inside the criminal justice system. Neither door returns a non-conviction that has been disposed of, and NRS 179A.110 confines whatever comes through either: a record "must be used solely for the purpose for which the record was requested", and no recipient may disseminate it further "without express authority of law or in accordance with a court order".

What is closed by statute stays closed until someone applies to open it. For a non-conviction, the mechanism is NRS 179A.160(1), which lets a person who was arrested, cited or made the subject of a warrant and then acquitted or favorably disposed of "apply in writing to the Central Repository and the agency which maintains the record to have it removed from the files which are available and generally searched for the purpose of responding to inquiries concerning the criminal history of a person". Subsection 2 withholds removal in five situations, and one of them catches the ordinary negotiated case: the disposition was "a deferred prosecution, plea bargain or other similar disposition". A plea bargain therefore keeps a charge in the searchable file even where the plea was to something the employer may not consider, and the operator's own FAQ is consistent with that, stating that a deferred sentence is "[n]ot necessarily" a conviction because a person who completes the probationary period is not convicted, while the removal remedy does not reach it.

Sealing after conviction is the larger mechanism and it is a restriction on distribution rather than a destruction. NRS 179.245(1) bands the waiting period by offense class: 10 years for a category A felony, a crime of violence or residential burglary; 5 years for a category B, C or D felony; 2 years for a category E felony; 2 years for a gross misdemeanor; 7 years for a violation of NRS 422.540 to 422.570, a non-felony violation of NRS 484C.110 or 484C.120, or a non-felony domestic battery; 2 years for a misdemeanor battery, harassment, stalking or violation of a protective order; and 1 year for any other misdemeanor. A petition under subsection 2 must be accompanied by the petitioner's own current Central Repository record and must "[i]nclude a list of any other public or private agency, company, official or other custodian of records that is reasonably known to the petitioner to have possession of records of the conviction and to whom the order to seal records, if issued, will be directed". A screening firm is a named class in that list, which is how a Nevada sealing order reaches a commercial file. Once made, NRS 179.285(1)(a) provides that "[a]ll proceedings recounted in the record are deemed never to have occurred, and the person to whom the order pertains may properly answer accordingly to any inquiry, including, without limitation, an inquiry relating to an application for employment, concerning the arrest, conviction, dismissal or acquittal and the events and proceedings relating to the arrest, conviction, dismissal or acquittal", subject to the opening words of the section, "Except as otherwise provided in NRS 179.301".

The exceptions to a sealing order are the part that a screening file has to hold on to. NRS 179.301 lets the Gaming Control Board and the Gaming Commission inspect sealed records related to gaming, the Division of Insurance inspect records related to insurance, a prosecuting attorney inspect records concerning NRS 202.485, and the State Board of Pardons Commissioners inspect where a pardon is sought. Subsection 4 reaches employers directly: "The Central Repository for Nevada Records of Criminal History and its employees may inquire into and inspect any records sealed pursuant to NRS 179.245 or 179.255 that constitute information relating to sexual offenses, and may notify employers of the information in accordance with federal laws and regulations." A sealed sexual offense record is therefore still reachable by the repository and still notifiable. The repository's own page states the character of the remedy without softening it: "an order sealing records is not an expungement of records, which allows for the destruction of the records", and the operator adds a limit that matters to a multi-state file, which is that "although the entry of an order by a court requires that certain criminal justice agencies located outside the State of Nevada are to comply with its direction, these agencies are not bound to follow this order. Therefore, it is possible that these records will not be removed from their record entry systems."

The routing consequence is that a Nevada answer has to say which system answered it. A repository response through the 179A.103 service is a convictions-only result carrying nothing from the courts, nothing juvenile, no misdemeanor traffic and nothing from outside Nevada, and it begins at the 1987 fingerprint record. A court search is run district by district, needs a case number or the parties and filing year, costs a per-name annual fee for anything before 1990 at the Clark County rate, and reaches sealed matters only on a court order. A local sheriff or police department can also run a check, and the repository's FAQ states the limit plainly: "the response will only include records specific to that office or department." None of those three is a Nevada statewide criminal history on its own, and the county is not the unit that separates them.

The federal baseline

Federal law sets the floor here as it does everywhere. It is at 15 U.S.C. §1681 et seq., it binds the agency and the employer separately, and it does not vary by state. The FCRA article covers it section by section, including the seven-year limits, the salary threshold and the adverse action sequence, so that this page does not restate any of it.

What follows is only the overlay: what Nevada adds on top of that floor, and where it departs from it.

What Nevada law adds

Reporting limits at a glance

Every figure below is against Nevada law. Where a row says “federal only”, the state has set nothing and 15 U.S.C. §1681c governs.

Adverse action here

The federal sequence applies unchanged: pre-adverse action notice with a copy of the report and the summary of rights, a reasonable opportunity to dispute, then the adverse action notice with the agency’s details and a dispute route. The FCRA article sets it out in full.

Nevada adds a state notice duty in chapter 598C that is stated as three acts. NRS 598C.170 provides that where "a person takes adverse action with respect to a consumer which is based on a consumer report from a reporting agency, the person shall: 1. Notify the consumer of the action taken; 2. Furnish him or her with the name and address of the reporting agency; and 3. Inform him or her of his or her right to obtain a copy of the consumer report from the agency." The duty is tied to action taken on a consumer report rather than to a report obtained, and the third element is a right-to-a-copy notice rather than a copy.

For a public employer, the state procedure puts its own steps in front of the decision and they are not the federal ones. NRS 245.046(5) requires a rejection or rescission of an offer to be made in writing, to "[i]nclude a statement indicating that the criminal history of the applicant was the basis for the rejection or rescission of the offer" and to "[p]rovide an opportunity for the applicant to discuss the basis for the rejection or rescission of the offer with the director of the department of human resources of the county or a person designated by the director". Subsection (6) requires the application form itself to state that "[a] record of conviction will not necessarily bar the applicant from employment" and to list the factors that will be considered. NRS 284.283 carries the same scheme for the classified state service. A county, city, town or state agency that runs the federal sequence and stops has not done this part.

Three categories of record are placed off limits to a public employer's consideration, and one of them is a sealed conviction. NRS 245.046(4) and NRS 284.283(4) each exclude "an arrest of the applicant which did not result in a conviction", "a record of conviction which was dismissed, expunged or sealed", and "an infraction or misdemeanor for which a sentence of imprisonment in a county jail was not imposed", the first of the three carrying the proviso "Except as otherwise provided in subsection 3". Where a screening report carries a Nevada conviction that has since been sealed, NRS 179.285(1)(a) is the provision that decides the point, because the person "may properly answer accordingly to any inquiry, including, without limitation, an inquiry relating to an application for employment". The repository can still notify an employer of a sealed record relating to a sexual offense under NRS 179.301(4), and the repository's own page states that "an order sealing records is not an expungement of records", so a letter that treats a sealing order as though the record had never existed overstates it.

Two state exposure routes run alongside the federal sequence and neither depends on it. NRS 613.590 gives an employee or prospective employee a private action for legal or equitable relief, including employment, reinstatement or promotion and lost wages and benefits, with a three-year limitation, and NRS 613.600 lets the Labor Commissioner impose an administrative penalty of "not more than $9,000 for each such violation" for a credit-check breach. NRS 613.133(4) makes a salary-history breach an unlawful employment practice, subsection (6) allows an administrative penalty of "not more than $5,000 for each such violation", and NRS 613.134 provides a right-to-sue notice on request once 180 days have passed since the complaint. A decision influenced by credit content or by pay history therefore carries a state proceeding that no federal notice obligation addresses.

What a Nevada letter sits on matters as much as what it says. NRS 179A.110 provides that a record of criminal history obtained under the chapter "must be used solely for the purpose for which the record was requested" and bars further dissemination "without express authority of law or in accordance with a court order", so an adverse action taken on a record obtained through the NRS 179A.103 service has to be a determination of suitability for the employment in question. Where the search was a court search rather than a repository search, the basis is the court file, and the repository's content limits do not describe it.

Nevada adds no separate state adverse-action notice for a convictions-only criminal history report and no state lookback on convictions, so the federal sequence is the whole of the procedural requirement there. The state overlay is the chapter 598C notice where a reporting agency's consumer report is involved, the written statement and discussion opportunity in the public-sector procedure, and the two administrative and private exposure routes at NRS 613.133 and NRS 613.570. The reverse is also worth keeping straight: the seven-year purge at NRS 598C.150(2) reaches arrest and charge material, so a Nevada adverse action taken on a non-conviction that is still inside the window is a state question as well as a federal one.

Screening in Nevada: what your process needs

• Read NRS 179A.103 before designing a Nevada repository product. It establishes the name-based service, and the definition of "Eligible person" includes a screening service by name, so the participation route is a contract with the Central Repository rather than an argument that the firm stands in the employer's shoes.
• Set the expectation that the 179A.103 service returns convictions only. Subsection 5 is one sentence and it is a content limit, so any Nevada product line that depends on non-conviction data has to be built on the court of record instead.
• Use the federal disclosure and authorization as the state search consent, and check where it is directed. NRS 179A.103(6)(b) accepts a form complying with 15 U.S.C. § 1681b(b)2, but where the participant is a screening service the consent runs to the eligible person designating it, so the file needs to show which employer designated the service.
• Keep a dissemination log. NRS 179A.103(7) conditions the pass-through to the employer client on the screening service maintaining records of its dissemination, and NRS 179A.110 independently bars further dissemination without express authority of law or a court order.
• Expect an audit right and a termination right. Subsections 8 and 9 let the Central Repository audit an authorized participant for secure maintenance and terminate participation for unpaid fees or unaddressed audit deficiencies, and subsection 2 limits the contract to a fee and compliance with applicable law.
• Do not treat a Nevada repository response as a Nevada criminal history. It excludes court indices and public judicial records, misdemeanor traffic violations, juvenile information, licensing records and everything originating outside Nevada criminal justice agencies, and it runs from the 1987 fingerprint record. Send pre-1987 enquiries to the arresting agency.
• Plan for the timing on the repository side. The operator states a 30 calendar day processing target with about two further weeks for mail and delivery, and civil applicant account approval "can take anywhere from 6 to 8 weeks and will not be expedited".
• Do not apply the 15-employee threshold to the ban-the-box rule. NRS 613.330(8) names public bodies directly, and NRS 613.310(2) confines its own definition to "NRS 613.310 to 613.4383". The threshold does reach the off-duty-use protection at NRS 613.333.
• For a public employer in Nevada, apply the earliest-of trigger and the three excluded record types. Consideration is permitted only after the final in-person interview, certification or a conditional offer, and an arrest without a conviction, a conviction that was dismissed, expunged or sealed, and an infraction or misdemeanor with no county jail sentence are placed off limits to consideration, the arrest item subject to the proviso for charges pending within the previous six months.
• For a public employer, write the rejection the way NRS 245.046(5) and NRS 284.283(5) require: in writing, stating that criminal history was the basis, and with an opportunity to discuss it with the county human resources director for a county or the director of human resources for the appointing authority for a state position, or a person either designates. The application form must also carry the statement that a conviction will not necessarily bar employment and the factors that will be considered.
• Check the exemptions before assuming the public-sector rule applies. NRS 245.046(7) and NRS 284.283(7) exclude applicants as peace officers or firefighters and applicants for positions with physical access to computer or equipment used for access to the Nevada Criminal Justice Information System or the National Crime Information Center.
• Do not use salary history in Nevada, and give the range when it is owed. NRS 613.133 binds public and private employers with no headcount, covers employment agencies, and requires the wage or salary range for an applicant who has completed an interview and for an employee who has applied for a promotion or transfer, interviewed for it or been offered it, and asked.
• Read the credit-check section by content, not by the name of the report. NRS 613.570 covers credit information and NRS 613.550 confines that term to information related to credit, so a criminal-history report is outside it. If a credit component runs, document the NRS 613.580 basis, including the reasonably-related list that covers money and assets, trade secrets, managerial or supervisory responsibility, personal information of others and licensed gaming.
• Do not refuse to hire on a positive pre-employment marijuana screen. NRS 613.132(1) bars it, subject to the exceptions at (2) and the second-test right at (3), and the exceptions are written around the position rather than around the employer.
• Keep the off-duty product protection and the cannabis chapters apart. NRS 613.333 is a 1991 provision about the lawful use of any product off the premises during nonworking hours, and it carries the 15-employee threshold. NRS 678D.510 preserves a workplace policy and NRS 678C.850 requires only an attempt at reasonable accommodation for a registered cardholder.
• Cite the current cannabis chapters. The NRS table of titles and chapters lists no chapter 453A and no chapter 453D, and the medical and adult-use provisions sit in Title 56 at NRS 678C.850 and NRS 678D.510.
• Handle a sealed Nevada conviction as a restricted record rather than a deleted one. NRS 179.285(1)(a) lets the person answer accordingly to an employment inquiry, subject to NRS 179.301, and the repository states that an order sealing records is not an expungement and that agencies outside Nevada are not bound by the order.
• Route the non-conviction question correctly. NRS 179A.160 removal is an application by the person, and it is unavailable where the disposition was a deferred prosecution, plea bargain or similar, where the person is a fugitive, where the case is under active prosecution, where there is a prior felony or gross misdemeanor conviction, or where there has been a later arrest or charge.
• Do not model Nevada courts county by county. There are 11 judicial districts, three of them hold more than one county and a fourth pairs an independent city with a county, and a record request needs a case number or the parties and filing year. Budget the NRS 19.013 search fee at the Clark County rate for anything before 1990 and route pre-1909 enquiries to Lincoln County.

Related states

• California. California bars non-conviction records categorically and sets no salary threshold at all, while its state criminal history repository is statutorily closed to consumer reporting agencies. Every search runs on county superior courts, all 58 of them.
• Arizona. Arizona does not release its criminal history to private employers or to consumer reporting agencies: the exchange list it keeps omits both, and releasing or procuring the release of the information outside that list is a class 6 felony, so an Arizona screening product runs on court records rather than on a repository check. Its statewide case search publishes 177 of 184 courts from one place and carries its own gap list, naming Maricopa Superior as displaying criminal cases only and Pima Superior as unavailable through the site.
• Oregon. Oregon releases criminal history to employers and screening firms only through a name-based search that the state police must label as unconfirmed, so the match rests on similarity of names and description rather than on fingerprints, the answer covers Oregon alone, and it returns every conviction with no time limit plus arrests less than a year old that ended in no acquittal or dismissal. Every request is disclosed to the person it is about before anything is released, and the department delivers fourteen days after sending that notice.

What we do

Nevada is a state where the repository door is open and the record behind it is narrow. NRS 179A.103 puts a name-based search service inside the Central Repository, makes a screening service an eligible person by name, accepts a consent form complying with 15 U.S.C. § 1681b(b)2, and lets the firm pass the result to the employer client if it keeps a dissemination log, while subsection 5 fixes the content at convictions only. The file sits at 333 West Nye Lane in Carson City, begins at the 1987 fingerprint record, and excludes the courts, juvenile matters, misdemeanor traffic, licensing records and everything originating outside Nevada. Ban-the-box is a public-sector rule with a final-interview trigger and three record types placed off limits to consideration, and the state's 15-employee threshold does not reach it. Salary history is barred for every employer with no headcount, credit checks are restricted by content rather than by subject, and the privacy chapter takes consumer reporting agencies out of its consumer provisions by name and by federal reference. The courts are 11 judicial districts, three of which cross county lines, and a felony reaches the district court by exclusion from the justice court. Our Nevada work separates the repository response from the court search, states which one answered the question, keeps the consent directed to the employer that designated the service, and treats a sealed conviction as restricted rather than as absent. If your current vendor reports a Nevada non-conviction from the state repository, or applies a county-by-county court model, that is where this shows.

Sources

• NRS ch. 179A, the Central Repository for Nevada Records of Criminal History, including the name-based search service at 179A.103, dissemination at 179A.100, sole use at 179A.110, the dissemination log at 179A.130, fees at 179A.140 and non-conviction removal at 179A.160
• NRS ch. 179, sealing of records after conviction, including the waiting periods at NRS 179.245, the effect of an order at NRS 179.285, reopening at NRS 179.295 and inspection by agencies at NRS 179.301
• NRS ch. 598C, "CONSUMER REPORTING", including the definitions at 598C.020, 598C.060 and 598C.100, the purge duty at 598C.150 and the adverse-action notice at 598C.170
• NRS ch. 613, employment practices, including the public-sector ban-the-box at 613.330(8), the employer definition at 613.310(2), the marijuana screening bar at 613.132, salary history at 613.133, the off-duty product protection at 613.333, lie detector tests at 613.480 to 613.510 and credit checks at 613.520 to 613.600
• NRS ch. 603A, "SECURITY AND PRIVACY OF PERSONAL INFORMATION", including the breach notice to nationwide consumer reporting agencies at 603A.220(6), the consumer reporting agency and Fair Credit Reporting Act exclusions at 603A.338, the employment-context exclusion at 603A.425 and the health data applicability at 603A.490
• NRS ch. 3, district courts, including the 11 judicial districts at NRS 3.010, the family court division at NRS 3.0105, the Second Judicial District bench at NRS 3.012 and 3.0125, the Eighth Judicial District bench at NRS 3.018 and 3.0185 and the chief judge at NRS 3.025
• NRS chs. 2A, 4 and 5, the Court of Appeals, the justice courts and the municipal courts, including the justice court criminal jurisdiction at NRS 4.370(3), the municipal court jurisdiction at NRS 5.050 and the jurisdictional rule-making at NRS 2A.160
• NRS chs. 245 and 284, the county and state employment procedures, including the criminal history trigger and the excluded record types at NRS 245.046 and 284.283 and the unclassified service procedure at NRS 284.281
• Nevada Constitution, article 6, the judicial department, including the court system at section 1 and the district court jurisdiction at section 6
• NRS chs. 678C and 678D, medical and adult-use cannabis under Title 56, including the accommodation provision at NRS 678C.850 and the workplace policy provision at NRS 678D.510
• NRS table of titles and chapters, which lists Title 56, "REGULATION OF CANNABIS", as chapters 678A to 678D and lists no chapter 453A or 453D
• Nevada State Police Records, Communications and Compliance Division, Frequently Asked Questions, for the content of a Nevada criminal history record, the 1987 fingerprint boundary, the effect of a refused waiver, the deferred sentence answer, the 30 calendar day processing target and the 6 to 8 week civil applicant approval, read live
• Nevada State Police Records, Communications and Compliance Division, Information on the Sealing of Nevada Criminal History Records, for the statement that sealing is not an expungement, the access restriction on a sealed record, the position of agencies outside Nevada and the 2 to 4 month sealing timescale, read live
• Nevada State Police Records, Communications and Compliance Division, Fees & Information (Fingerprints), for the fee schedule and the civil applicant approval time, read live
• Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County, Records Search and Viewing, for the record date range, the case number requirement, the NRS 19.013 search and copy fees, certification and exemplification charges, the sealed case rule and the Lincoln County boundary, read live
• Route note: www.leg.state.nv.us returns HTTP 403 to this environment on every path tried, including with a browser User-Agent, over plain HTTP and over HTTPS, with a 1,747-byte block page; nvcourts.gov returns HTTP 403 with a Cloudflare interstitial. Every Nevada statute quoted here was read through the r.jina.ai reader proxy against the same URLs, returning live pages carrying a [Rev. 4/15/2026 11:25:56 AM--2025] stamp, with the earlier chapter reads confirmed against Internet Archive raw replay discovered through the CDX API. The proxy returned a Cloudflare interstitial for these hosts earlier in this project and worked for this pass, which is a change in the record rather than a failure. www.rccd.nv.gov, www.dps.nv.gov and www.clarkcountycourts.us were reachable live and were read directly. library.municode.com serves a JavaScript shell that renders no code text, and cityofhenderson.com, cityofnorthlasvegas.com and codelibrary.amlegal.com return 403, so no Nevada municipal code was read.

Last reviewed 23 September 2026. This page is checked on a quarterly cycle, because state screening law changes every legislative session. Nothing here is legal advice; see the terms of use.